25
3 In the fifth live of section 44 (11)
misprints "he" having been
there is a m
Substituted for "be".
4 I presume that it was not- thought necessary to include in section 263 the provisions of section 277 (8) of the Companies Act 1929. 5 Sub Sections (3), (4), (5) + (6) 07
Section 319 appear
to be redundant
except as regards the reference to
the use
бра
Cuniese translation of the word
"limited"; the other provisions of
these subsections ahe
repeated in
Bechons 322(1), 323, 326 and 327
respectively.
Article 68 of
6. Table A in the First Schedule to
Ack
4929 contami's
68
a
the Companies mispruch & I strands notice that this has been followed in Article 68 Table A in the first- Schedule of the Ordce. At the end of the quad and beginning
57
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.